In the 1800's the revolution was sweeping the world

What is the name of the national of federal legislative branch

LUCKY_DIMON [66]

The legislative branch of the U.S. government is called Congress. Congress has two parts, the Senate and the House of Representatives. Congress meets in the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, DC.

6 0

2 years ago

Wo observers observe a child in the classroom every 30 minutes to record whether he is behaving aggressively. They use two categ

ioda

Answer:

a. To calculate the report, the only observation that is valid and accurate, are observation 1, 3, 6, 8,9. Because in this observation, the two observed answers are the same for the student, therefore our calculation, to be accurate, we should only use this observations that are the same to calculate .

Observation 1,6,9 which was YES for the two observers

Observation 3 and 8 which was No for the two observers.

This means that from the observation we can term valid, the number of YES is greater than the number of NO.

That means the child is aggressive. Though the research has so much error in the reliability of the observation.

b. The observation does not demonstrate inter observers reliability, because their records in an observation are not the same, that means a specific method to record the childs answer of YES or NO was not defined, and this made the research to have more, error.

We can't tell the result in observation 2,4,5,7,10 because those observation contradict each other, and this has limited the acceptance of the result of this observational research,

4 0

3 years ago

A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie.

eduard

Answer:

a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".

Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.

While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.

b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.

In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.

In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.

4 0

2 years ago

Highlight the details that describe a problem. Up, up, up went the temperature in a fuel line on the descent engine. Up, up went

nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

its ******* d not c .

Explanation:

just got 66.7 cuz i put c ugh and i got the other ones right . but its D .

7 0

3 years ago

What constitutional clause prohibits a state from drawing unreasonable distinctions between its own residents and those of perso

agasfer [191]

<span>The Privileges and Immunity Clause in the Constitution makes it known that citizens of one state visiting another state have the same rights as the citizens living in the state they are visiting. This clause was based on a provision In the Articles of Confederation that sought to establish fair treatment of everyone within the Union.</span>

8 0

3 years ago

In the 1800's the revolution was sweeping the world ​

In the 1800's the revolution was sweeping the world