CuCl2 + 2NaNO3 ----> Cu(NO3)2 + 2NaCl
using molar masses:-
Theoretical yields:-
63.54 + 2(35.45) g of CuCl2 produces 2(22.98 + 35.45) g of NaCl
134.44 g .................................................... 116.86 g
31.0 g ....................................................31.0 * 116.86 /134.44=26.95g
So percentage yield is 21.2* 100 / 26.95 = 78.7% to nearest tenth
Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.
- Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
- Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
- Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
- A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
- Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.
Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that
proves an answer in Science.
Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ9
Answer:A) It was developed from past observations- true
It is subject to experimentation and revision.- false
It explains why mass is conserved- false
It predicts future observations-true
Explanation:
Before a hypothesis is proclaimed to be a law in science, numerous observation must have confirmed its validity and rigorous experimentation under carefully controlled conditions usually precedes the acceptance of a hypothesis as a law. The law of conservation of mass was developed from numerous past observation that proved its validity.
