What are the differences between a trail court and an appeals court

2 answers:

7 0

The last major difference between the trial courts and the appellate courts is the role of the jury. A jury is a group of citizens who listen to the facts and make decisions about the case. A jury is sometimes used in trial courts to help decide the case. ... Appellate judges determine the outcome of all appeals.

CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago

5 0

Trial courts are the courts where cases start. In the trial court, both sides present evidence to show their version of what happened. The appellate court overrules a trial court decision only if a very important legal error was made in the trial court. In some cases, the appellate court judges might believe that the outcome of the trial court should have been different, but if no legal errors were made, they will not overrule the lower court.

You might be interested in

Do you think that the united states tried their best to stop the 9/11 terrorist attacks

DedPeter [7]

Ok first off im sorry but i am a conspiracy theorist and BUSH DID 9-11 but other than that yea i think they did their best to go to war

6 0

3 years ago

Part II: Application and Critical Thinking (30 points)

madreJ [45]

Answer:

The answer is detailed in the explanation;

Explanation:

Dear Sir, Jhon Locke;

With my sincere words I do not intend to change his ideals of reform but I do intend to be heard on the basis of the experience of the human being and what characterizes him, it is well known that the man without law is an irrational being incapable of restraining his impulses and actions Likewise, ambition, greed for power causes divisions and doubts to be sown and the fracture of power occurs, that is why an absolute monarchy where absolute power and responsibility falls on only that supreme being already chosen of impartial way to impartially govern all kinds of people without any preference to either side, for me it is and surely being the ideal form of government.

Respected Sir; Thomas hobbe :

Considering his arguments, I find a heartfelt contradiction; if the power corrupts the human being who by natural tendency is given to ambition and greed; How can absolute power and responsibility be left to govern and educate an entire people in the hands of one man?

Really, in an absolute monarchy there is no freedom, there is no democracy, we need to work as a team to help each other to balance power, although it is true that two heads think more than one, being in a position of responsibility and knowing that we have that answering for our acts before the laws or branches of power causes us to be more cautious when making decisions that could affect our nation, our actions have consequences and a bad control of absolute power undoubtedly brings total chaos.

4 0

4 years ago

While they lived in England, King James I told the Puritans that they had to attend the Church of England or face legal punishme

Natalija [7]

Answer:

Correct answer: True

Explanation:

Puritan is commonly applied to a reform movement that aim to purify the practices and structure of the Church of England. They believe that civil authorities should enforce religion. King James 1 had series of issues with the Puritans regarding to religion and its affilated problems.

Due to this issue, most Puritians left England and moved to America inorder to escape the religious persecution they are facing in the hand of King James 1.

6 0

3 years ago

What did the creation of public works show about the economy of the Mauryan Empire?

vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

the answer is b

Explanation:

Due to the strong economy, the government collected enough taxes to pay for public works

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who was the 5th president and did he/she benifit our country?