All categories

2 years ago

5x70= 5 x_tens = tens =____? Use place value to find the product.

Mathematics

2 answers:

zhuklara [117]2 years ago

5 0

5 × 70 = 5 × 7 tens = 350

WHY?

1 ten = 10 ones

70 ÷ 10 = 7

So 7 tens.

Hope I helped ya!

artcher [175]2 years ago

5 0

Solution:

5 x 70 = 5 x <u> 7 </u> tens

At the blank space 7.

Because 1 ten = 1 x 10

Therefore, 70 = 7 tens

70 as 7 tens

5 x 70 = 5 x <u> 7 </u> tens =<u> 35 </u>tens

Because 5 x 7 =35

As we know 35 tens = 350

Because 1 tens = 10

Therefore, 35 tens = 350

Thus, 5x70 = 350

You might be interested in

Help me please!!!!!!!

NARA [144]

Answer:

sorry can't help hope someone gets it

6 0

2 years ago

3(2x - 1) = 1/2 (4x - 2) + 2<br> What would it be?

Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

X = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Just distribute properly, and distribute the fraction multiplying the numerator by 4 and 2

6 0

2 years ago

Cloverdale Middle School is buying new helmets for the football team. Each helmet costs $89.95. How much money does the school s

seraphim [82]

Answer:

4047.75$

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Question 1

zhannawk [14.2K]

The applications that will involve percentages include:

Sales Tax
Original Sale Price
Commission
Income Tax

<h3>Which applications involve percentages?</h3>

Sales tax will involve percentage because the sales tax percentage will be needed to calculate the sales tax. The same goes for the income tax.

Commissions also involve percentages as the commission is a percentage of sales. The original sales price can only be acquired by using the discount or markup percentage applied to it to get the current sales price.

Find out examples of commission percentages at brainly.com/question/24951536.

6 0

1 year ago

"assume that s is a non-empty set of real numbers which is bounded above and lambda is the least upper bound. Prove that for all

s2008m [1.1K]

By definition, if $\lambda$ is the least upper bound of the set $S$ , it means two thing:

$\forall x \in S,\ x \leq \lambda$
$\forall \varepsilon>0,\ \exists x \in S:\ x>\lambda-\varepsilon$

In other words, the least upper bound of a set is greater than or equal to every single element of the set, but it is "close enough" to the elements of the set, because you guaranteed to find elements in the set between $\lambda-\varepsilon$ and $\lambda$

For example, pick $S = [1,10)$ . Obvisouly, the least upper bound is $\lambda = 10$ . In fact, every number in $[1,10)$ is smaller than 10, but as soon as you take away something from 10, say 0.01, you get 9.99, and there are elements in $S$ greater than 9.99, say 9.9999.

So, the claim is basically proven by definition: if $\beta < \lambda$ , let $0 < \delta = \lambda - \beta$ . By definition, there exists $\alpha \in S:\ \alpha > \lambda - \delta$ .

8 0

3 years ago

5x70= 5 x_____tens = ______tens =______? Use place value to find the product.

5x70= 5 x_tens = tens =____? Use place value to find the product.