The first thing we must do for this case is to define a variable.
We have then:
t: time a customer can stay in a restaurant.
We write now the inequality.
We have then:
Answer:
an inequality to show how long a customer can stay at the restaurant is:

<h2>
Answer:</h2>
<u>Every 18 feet.</u>
<h2>
Step-by-step explanation:</h2>
<h3>1. Find the LCM between the numbers.</h3>
LCM stands for "least common multiple", and is the least number that results from multiplicating any of the 3 numbers by another number.
Analyze numbers starting from 9 to find the LCM. The first number than can be divided by 3, 6, and 9 is 18. Hence, 18 is out LCM
<h3>2. Interpret the results.</h3>
18 as a LCM means that every 18 feet there will be lights at the same distance in the circular road.
<u>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</u>
<u />
Check out the attched image to see a linear graphic representation of the problem.
Answer: (A) H0: μ = 140 mg vs. H1: μ ≠ 140 mg
Step-by-step explanation:
Usually null hypothesis represents the claim that the values associated to the groups being tested have no statistical difference but alternative hypothesis supports the claim that there is statistical difference.
Let
be the population mean .
We are given that the mean potassium content of a popular sports drink is listed as 140 mg in a 32-oz bottle.
i.e. Null hypothesis :
Alternative hypothesis for two tail hypothesis has sign (≠).
i.e. Alternative hypothesis : 
∴ The hypotheses for a two-tailed test of the claimed potassium content:
H0: μ = 140 mg vs. H1: μ ≠ 140 mg
78.33 (3 rounds down)
0.0605 (5 rounds up)
288.60 (8 rounds up, but there is a nine, so nine becomes 0 and 5 becomes 6)
0.101 (8 rounds up)