Answer:
Tungsten is used for this experiment
Explanation:
This is a Thermal - equilibrium situation. we can use the equation.
Loss of Heat of the Metal = Gain of Heat by the Water
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10d6e/10d6e26b640e6d9602c5099109110370a281249d" alt="-Q_{m}=+Q_{w}\\"
Q = mΔTdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/976ef/976ef63e1a2d91ea627a1490f526307c5e8ea477" alt="C_{p}"
Q = heat
m = mass
ΔT = T₂ - T₁
T₂ = final temperature
T₁ = Initial temperature
Cp = Specific heat capacity
<u>Metal</u>
m = 83.8 g
T₂ = 50⁰C
T₁ = 600⁰C
Cp = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff749/ff74999466001614f735a3e6ddf547c3b48f36bb" alt="x"
<u>Water</u>
m = 75 g
T₂ = 50⁰C
T₁ = 30⁰C
Cp = 4.184 j.g⁻¹.⁰c⁻¹
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10d6e/10d6e26b640e6d9602c5099109110370a281249d" alt="-Q_{m}=+Q_{w}\\"
⇒ - 83.8 x
x (50 - 600) = 75 x 4.184 x (50 - 30)
⇒
=
j.g⁻¹.⁰c⁻¹
We know specific heat capacity of Tungsten = 0.134 j.g⁻¹.⁰c⁻¹
So metal Tungsten used in this experiment
A because of the way it looks and how it works
Answer:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d23b/2d23b8b2cbbcacb5f8dc3a9b7c0291bfbac5a0e5" alt="PO_4^{3-}(aq)+3Ag^+(aq)\rightarrow Ag_3PO_4(s)"
Explanation:
Hello!
In this case, since the net ionic equation of a chemical reaction shows up the ionic species that result from the simplification of the spectator ions, which are those at both reactants and products sides, we take into account that aqueous species ionize into ions whereas liquid, solid and gas species remain unionized. In such a way, for the reaction of cesium phosphate and silver nitrate we can write the complete molecular equation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12b22/12b22692abb113fff29fa7dc6d58419da0b6122f" alt="Cs_3PO_4(aq)+3AgNO_3(aq)\rightarrow Ag_3PO_4(s)+3CsNO_3(aq)"
Whereas the three aqueous salts are ionized in order to write the following complete ionic equation:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6ec8/d6ec8d3a861f47f02addb05372191433533f09b2" alt="3Cs^+(aq)+PO_4^{3-}(aq)+3Ag^+(aq)+3NO_3^-(aq)\rightarrow Ag_3PO_4(s)+3Cs^+(aq)+3NO_3^-(aq)"
In such a way, since the cesium and nitrate ions are the spectator ions because of the aforementioned, the net ionic equation turns out:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d23b/2d23b8b2cbbcacb5f8dc3a9b7c0291bfbac5a0e5" alt="PO_4^{3-}(aq)+3Ag^+(aq)\rightarrow Ag_3PO_4(s)"
Best regards!
<span>The right answer is D. In a situation where the sound wave reaches the ear and the reflected wave reaches the ear less than 0.1 seconds later, the individual would not be able to hear an echo. There needs to a far more significant delay between the sound and the reflection of said sound reaching the listener's ear for the echo effect to become apparent.</span>