COMPLETE PROBLEM
Lana, a ten-year-old child, is run over by a car negligently driven by Mitchell. Lana, at the time of the accident, was acting reasonably and without negligence. Clark, a newspaper reporter, photographs Lana while she is lying in the street in great pain. Two years later, Perry, the publisher of a newspaper, prints Clark's picture of Lana in his newspaper as a lead to an article concerning the negligence of children. The caption under the picture reads: "They ask to be killed." Lana, who has recovered from the accident, brings suit against Clark and Perry. What result? Explain.
Explanation:
Judgement for Lana against Perry but not against Clark. The facts make out a case against Perry for the tort of invasion of privacy in particular placing another in a false light (INVASION OF PRIVACY:FALSE LIGHT). Section 652E of the restatement imposes liability for publicity which places another in a false light. It is unlikely that Perry could utilize the first amendment as a defense because Lana was neither a public official nor a public figure. Even if that defense were available, it is forfeited if Perry acted with "malice", which appears to be the case here because Perry acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Clark did not commit the tort of intrusion because he photographed an event that occurred in public.
The correct answer to your question is letter D. "Both A and C"
Answer: A positive externality, negative externality and asymmetric information
Explanation:
A market failure is one of the type of economical situation in which the the various types of products and the services are distributions in an inefficient manner.
A positive externality, negative externality and an asymmetric information are the market failure that the government wants to change by the process of intervention
Externality is one of the type of advantage or cost that basically affect the third party in the economics so the free market under consuming the various types of products. Therefore, the given answer is correct.
Karim and Rashida Sultan are filing a joint federal return. They have the following investment income $597 Frankfort Mutual Fund dividends, $283 Credit Union dividends. The amount of total taxable dividends reported on Schedule B is: $1,706.
Total taxable dividend=Craft Inc. dividends + Frankfort Mutual Fund dividends+ Credit Union dividends
Where:
Craft Inc. dividends=$826
Frankfort Mutual Fund dividends=$597
Credit Union dividends=$283
Let plug in the formula
Total taxable dividend= $826+$597+$283
Total taxable dividend=$1,706
Inconclusion if Karim and Rashida Sultan are filing a joint federal return. They have the following investment income $597 Frankfort Mutual Fund dividends, $283 Credit Union dividends. The amount of total taxable dividends reported on Schedule B is: $1,706.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/20345678
The assessment ratio, which is used to convert the value of property to the assessed value, can also be considered <u>Equalization Rate</u>.
<h3>What is the equalization rate?</h3>
The equalization rate is the ratio of the total assessed value (AV) to a municipality's total market value (MV).
The equalization rate is a measurement of a municipality's level of assessment (LOA) by the state.
This implies that the municipality determines the AV while the state determines the MV.
Thus, the assessment ratio, which is used to convert the value of property to the assessed value, can also be considered <u>Equalization Rate</u>.
Learn more about the equalization rate at brainly.com/question/5428406
#SPJ1
