1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tresset [83]
4 years ago
13

To prevent burnout during your fitness plan, you need to start out with what plan?

Physics
1 answer:
Blababa [14]4 years ago
8 0
A warm up plan . Hope that helps
You might be interested in
A block of ice with mass 2.00 kg slides 0.890m down an inclined plane that slopes downward at an angle of 28.3 degrees below the
Butoxors [25]

Answer:  The final speed, ignoring the effects of friction, will be 2.88 m/s.

Explanation:

The problem can be solved using two different physical principles. If we resort to Newton's second Law, we can say that, neglecting friction (which is reasonable for a ice block) the only force acting on the block  in the direction of the movement along the plane, is the component of the weight that is parallel to the slope, i.e.

Fp = mg sin 28.3º = ma ⇒ a=g sin 28.3º

Now, as we know that g = constant, we can use the following kinematic equation:

vf² - v₀² = 2 a x

if the block starts from rest, this means that v₀ = 0.

Replacing by the values in the equation, and solving for vf, we get;

vf = vf = \sqrt{2. 9.8.0.89. sin 28.3}  = 2.88 m/s

The other approach is using the conservation of energy principle:

When the block starts, it has some potential energy = mgh

This height h, can be expressed in terms of x (the length travelled by the block downward the plane) and the angle that forms with the horizontal, as follows:

h = x sin 28.3 (applying sin definition) ⇒ U = mg x sin 28.3

At the the end of the slide, the potential energy has been converted to kinetic energy, so we can write the following equation:

m. g. x. sin 28.3º = 1/2 m vf²

Simplifying, replacing by the values and solving for vf, we arrive to the same result as above.

5 0
4 years ago
You are outdoors when you hear the constant chirp of a still cricket. You start walking toward the cricket and at some point you
givi [52]

Answer:

4) True, the distance was reduced by a de factor 2

Explanation:

To analyze the statements, let's first see how the sound is produced

The cricket makes the sound rubbed its legs, the energy needed to produce it is constant, after the sound is produced it expands in all directions and this wave is subject to the law of energy conservation.

By expanding in all directions we can assume that the energy for the time that is the power of the sound is distributed over a sphere with different radii each time. The perceived intensity is defined as the power per unit area

       I = P / A

Where P is the power, A are the areas and I are the intensities heard by the person

Let's clear the power and match, for two different radii (distances)    

      P = I₁ A₁ = I₂ A₂

The area of ​​a sphere is

     A = 4π R₂

     I₂ = I₁ A₁ / A₂

     I₂ = I₁ 4π R₁² / 4π R₂²

     I₂ = I₁ R₁² / R₂²

Let's analyze this last equation for the situation presented if the intensity increases 4 times, substitute

    I₂ = 4 I₁

    4 I₁ = I₁ R₁² / R₂²

   R₂ = R₁ / 2

We see that to increase the intensity 4 times the distance was reduced twice

Now we can analyze the expressions given

2) False, the power is constant, the cricket always does the same job

3) False, the speed of the wave is constant in the air

4) True, the distance was reduced by a de factor 2

3 0
3 years ago
<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%7B.5mv%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%20%3D%20mgh" id="TexFormula1" title=" {.5mv}^{2} = mgh" alt=" {.5m
Katyanochek1 [597]

You said 0.5 · m · v² = m · g · h

Divide each side by 'm' :  0.5 · v² = g · h

Multiply each side by 2 :  v² = 2 · g · h

Square root each side :   v = √(2 · g · h)

You said that  g = 9.8 m/s²  and  h = 875 units

So  v = √(9.8 m/s² · 875 units)

v = √(8,575 m·unit/s²)

v = 92.6 / s² · √(m · unit)

8 0
3 years ago
Geologists cannot yet predict earthquakes because
katrin2010 [14]
<span>Geologists cannot yet predict earthquakes because the earthquakes caused by the movement of plates do not have the precise time and place when will it moves.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
What do you do if you are measuring something and it is between two whole numbers?
AnnZ [28]
Umm, I guess it really depends on what these numbers are for but what I can say is if you put this under physics then decimals are used very often and help express parts of numbers for this particular problem.And if it's directly between the two then it's 0.50 added to that smaller number,I hope that helps
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • To get to the net, a soccer ball must travel 35 m [S 40° W]. If one player kicks it 25 m [E], what displacement must be achieved
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose a Southwest Airlines passenger plane took three hours to fly 1800 miles in the direction of the Jetstream. The return tr
    12·1 answer
  • What fraction of the volume of an iceberg (density 917 kg/m3) would be visible if the iceberg floats in (a) the ocean (salt wate
    11·1 answer
  • Can we use a clinical thermometer to measure the temperature of a candle flame​
    5·1 answer
  • If the power supply is to be made safe by increasing its internal resistance, what should the internal resistance be for the max
    10·1 answer
  • What is the value of the composite constant (Gme,/r2e) to be multiplied by the mass of the object mo, in equation below:
    10·1 answer
  • A car travels in the +x-direction on a straight and level road. For the first 3.00 s of its motion, the average velocity of the
    6·1 answer
  • Two pure tones are sounded together. The drawing shows the pressure variations of the two sound waves, measured with respect to
    11·1 answer
  • What is clear cutting?
    13·1 answer
  • Brandon pushes an object on a ramp as shown in the diagram.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!