I'd go for the middle one.
Benson and his colleagues take a strength-based approach to social policy for youth called <u>positive</u> youth development.
Youth development is a process that equips a child with the skills necessary to succeed in adulthood and the obstacles of adolescence. Activities and encounters that aid in the development of social, ethical, emotional, physical, and cognitive skills for youth are encouraged.
Positive youth development is a deliberate, pro-social approach that acknowledges, uses, and promotes young people's abilities while involving them in their communities, schools, organisations, peer groups, and families in a positive and constructive way.
Structures that improve overall life quality and future prospects by enhancing the "ecological base" and the "public estate" are referred to as positive development.
Learn more about youth development here
brainly.com/question/4299111
#SPJ4
Answer:
power-elite model
Explanation:
The power elite model is extremely similar to the oligarchy system. But the 'select few' that have the power in society does not have to necessarily a Nobel.
For example, units States is a power elite model even though we don't have a group that we consider as 'nobles here'. But when you clearly examine its power structure, you will realize that the control over the country falls to a small group of people such as military leaders, corporate owners, high ranking government officials and their family, etc
I believe it would be this phrase <span>"real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite"?. Real patriots indicates someone who are not afraid to take actions in for the benefit of one's country no matter how strong the enemy is. The word resist tend to refers to the withholding actions that being done by certain people.</span>
I believe the correct answer is - <span>It represents the perspective of an Anti-Federalist, arguing for a stronger role for the states.
As you can see in the quote above, this person doesn't want America to be a federalist state, made up of a number of states, but run by one single government. He believes that it would be much better if each state had its own government and could decide what is best for itself, and not depend on somebody else's decisions.
</span>
