The correct answer should be
E. Opportunities
Answer:
b) If auditors can demonstrate due diligence.
Explanation:
Under the liability provisions of section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, auditors may be liable to any purchaser of a security for certifying materially misstated financial statements that are included in the registration statement. Under section 11, auditors usually will not be liable to the purchaser if auditors can demonstrate due diligence.
Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77k (1988), provides investors with the ability to hold issuers and others liable for any damage incurred and caused by false statements of fact or even material omissions of fact within registration statements as at when effective.
The Securities Act of 1933 was used to regulate the stock market as the first federal legislation. With this act, power was given to the federal government and taken away from the state governments.
Hence, the Securities Act of 1933 is used to protect investors from frauds by creating a set of standard rules.
In conclusion, auditors usually will not be liable to the purchaser if auditors can demonstrate due diligence in their services and responsibilities.
I would say that is an alright deal you get prime video and music
Answer:
$255,000
Explanation:
Given that,
2016:
Taxable and pretax financial income = $850,000
Tax rate = 30%
2017:
Taxable and pretax financial income = $850,000
Tax rate = 35%
Income tax refund receivable in 2018:
= Taxable and pretax financial loss in 2018 × Tax rate in the year 2016
= $850,000 × 30 percent
= $255,000
Note:
(i) The carry back provision allows losses to be carried back to preceding 2 years, with the amount of net loss being applied to earliest year first.
(ii) 2018 net loss should be applied to income of 2016 first.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.! D