D is the answer, It is clearly organized so the reader can easily follow along
1. c. describing the beauty of nature and how individuals interact with it
2. a. a rise in crime and poverty
3. a. subject
4. b. predicate nominative
5. a. subject
Answer:
America´s literary heritage
Explanation:
From the Colonial Period (17th century) and Early National Period to the Romantic Period (1830- 1870) to Realism and Naturalism (1870-1910) to the Modernist Period (1910-1945), they all contributed in some way or another to the Contemporary Period in literature, that reflected the social upheaval that acompanied the contemporary and all the other socio-political periods of America.
There is no such thing as a typical American writing style.
The core values (like the natural rights of people) do play a significant role but they don´t determine American literature.
America´s leadership or hegemony is a fact but it doesn´t make its literature consistent.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
What change should be made in sentence 3? (Mikayla placed the dough on her right hand and then spins it into the air, trying to mimic the chef.)
A. Insert a comma after "fist".
B. Change "then" to "than".
C. Change "spins" to "spun".
D. Change "it" to "them".
Answer:
The change that should be made in sentence 3 is:
C. Change "spins" to "spun".
Explanation:
The sentence "Mikayla placed the dough on her right hand and then spins it into the air, trying to mimic the chef" is incorrect for only one reason - the shift in verb tenses. The sentence begins with a verb in the simple past and, all of a sudden, changes to the simple present. It is clear that this is a sequence of actions that took place in the past, one after the other, so the shift is inappropriate in this case. To correct it, we must change the verb in the present form (spins) to the past form (spun):
Mikayla placed the dough on her right hand and then spun it into the air, trying to mimic the chef.
Answer : Odysseus' name sounds like nobody. He means that the cyclops will be eating nobody. Lines 276-277: Explain the irony of the gift the Cyclops says he will give to Odysseus. The irony is that the gift is the gift of the God and Odysseus is not a god.
Explanation:
Because he mean he will eat odysseus last, but he stumbles on the truth later on that he will eat no more of Odysseus's men
