Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available
Answer:
<em>An electronic record</em>
Explanation:
An electronic record is data <em>that is or is being generated by a desktop. It is obtained when an agency or individual activity is initiated, conducted or completed.</em>
Instances of digital records include: email messages, handwritten documentation, electronic spreadsheets, digital photos, and databases.
Answer: an increment in profit $1615
Explanation:
2700 pounds of Banana
Total cost = $864
If sold = $1485
When converted into bread $2565 and sold at the cost of $4480
Oven rentage = $300
What is the incremental effect on income if Publix converts the bananas to banana bread?
Sales Amount - Expenses incurred
= $4480 - $2565 + $300
= $4480 - $2865
= $1615
If he had sold the bananas
Sales amount - cost amount
= $1485 - $864
= $621
By converting the bananas to bread the incremental effect on income is it would yield more profits at $1615 compared to when sold at which is $621
Answer:
preferred stockholders received $15,000 during the first 3 years
- $2,000 in the first year
- $6,000 in the second year
- $7,000 in the third year
common shareholders received $25,000 in dividends during the third year.
Explanation:
preferred stock = 1,000 shares x $100 par value x 5% = $5,000
common stock = 10,000 shares at $10 par value
dividends declared and paid during the first 3 years:
year dividends
1 $2,000
2 $6,000
3 $32,000
preferred stockholders should have received $5,000 per year x 3 years = $15,000. Preferred stockholders must be paid first, and their payment is fixed. If the dividends are not enough to pay the total amount, the remaining amount should be paid next year.
- $2,000 in the first year
- $6,000 in the second year
- $7,000 in the third year
common shareholders received $32,000 - $7,000 = $25,000 in dividends during the third year.
Answer:
The correct answer is 3. identification of a strategic resource gap that will impede future growth.
Explanation:
The build-borrow-or-buy framework is adopted to develop the most appropriate strategy towards an organization's growth. It provides three alternatives to the management: build the asset itself, borrow it from an external organization, or simply buy it.
Sometimes, any one of these three options is applicable to an organization, but typically, a combination of these may be preferred by the management, thus adopting a multi-faceted approach.
The first step in the build-borrow-or-buy framework is to identify strategic resource gaps that could impede future growth using the organization's strategic planning process. This is because it is necessary to identify right at the beginning what resources the organization needs going into the future. If this gap is wrongly assessed, the organization, may under-estimate or over-estimate its existing resources, thus ending up with the wrong growth strategy.
