Answer:
C) The supply curve moved to the left.
Explanation:
A supply curve shift to the left due to a reduction in the quantity supplied to markets. When the market is at equilibrium, a decrease in supply will likely to create a shortage. Buyers will compete to buy the few available items at the price that suppliers will demand. Suppliers will take advantage of the " increase " in demand to raise prices.
A reduced supply means that the quantity available in the market decreases. At equilibrium, the quantity supplied matches demand, but when supply decreases, the quantity supplied also decreases.
Answer:
The answer is "$5500".
Explanation:
Analysis Differential:
Make Buy
Cost of variable 
Fixed- cost 
Purchasing cost 
Cost of opportunity 
Total relevant cost 
Increasing operating income 
Answer:
question
1. how much amortization expense on the goodwill can Ingrid deduct in year 1, year 2, year 3?
2. In lieu of the original facts, assume that Ingrid purchase only a phone list with a useful life of 5 years for $16,500.
How much amortization expense on the phone list can Ingrid deduct in year 1, year 2 and year 3?
Explanation:
The explanation is shown in the file attached. Thank you i hope it helps
As mentioned the alley was dark. So it is possible that there was someone else at the crime scene and the witness is mistaken to be that man. It is quite possible to see someone in the dark and mistaken them for someone else. As the alley was dark, eye witness testimony is not reliable.
The eyewitness doesn’t have any evidence whereas my client has an alibi and he was not present at the crime scene. Even if my client was standing near the boy it doesn’t prove that he killed someone.
Answer:
$70,000
Explanation:
Under a Comparative negligence theory,
When an accident occurs, the blame or fault is determined by the contributions of each party towards the accident.
In a pure comparative negligence theory, the victim or plaintiff who files a case, sue the other party and received some part of the damages and hence each party receives the amount related to their damages minus the part of their fault.
In our case, Annette fault contributes 30% to the collision and determined that her total loss was $100,000.
So, Annette will recover:
= Total loss - 30% of fault
= $100,000 - 0.3 × $100,000
= $100,000 - $30,000
= $70,000
