Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
There are several ways to go at this.
My first choice is to use a graphing calculator. It shows the function has a zero at x=5, so x-5 is a factor.
Another good choice is to use synthetic division (2nd attachment). If the remainder is zero, then x-5 is a factor. It is and it is.
__
You can also evaluate the function at x=5. The remainder theorem tells you that if the value is zero, then x-5 is a factor. Evaluating the polynomial written in Horner form is a lot like synthetic division.
(((x -4)x -15)x +58)x -40 for x=5 is ... (-10·5 +58)5 -40 = 40-40 = 0
The value of h(5) is zero, so x-5 is a factor of h(x).
Hey there!!
25 is the answer
Hope this helps. c:
Answer:
K'= (-1,-1)
J'= (-1,-5)
L'= (0,-3)
Step-by-step explanation:
What you do here is, input the (x,y) coordinates into the translation.
For example, the original point K is (-3,5). Insert this into the translation.
(-3,5) → (-3+2, 5-8) = (-1,-3)
Repeat this for the next coordinates of L and J.
J= (-3,3)
(-3,3) → (-3+2, 3-8) = (-1,-5)
L= (-2, 5)
(-2, 5) → (-2+2, 5-8) = (0,-3)
Answer: That would be a vertical pair and X is 38
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, it's reasonable.
What you are doing is solving the question by rounding. You come up with an answer. Suppose you loose the decimal somewhere and you get 0.36? Is that reasonable? Do you just write the answer in the provided blank and move on. What now?
You get it wrong?!!
But your estimate should be about 9/3 = 3. Now you look at your calculator with great misgivings, because it made a mistake. Did it or did you? Well ultimately you did, but you have to blame something. So the calculator takes the heat.
Who knows? Maybe the decimal doesn't work. It's stuck or something. In any event you should be aware that there's no way the answer could be 0.36 when you estimate it to be 3.
