Answer:
the total cost of the new equipment is $105,500
Explanation:
The computation of the total cost of the new equipment is given below:
Total cost of the new equipment is
= Net price + Sales tax + Installation charges + Payment for concrete slab
= [$100,000 - ($100,000 × 2%)] + $3,000 + $1,500 + $3,000
= $105,500
Hence, the total cost of the new equipment is $105,500
After you have completed the FAFSA and applied to colleges
Answer:
Cost of goods sold = $576,900
Explanation:
The budgeted cost of goods sold will be the sales volume in 2020 multiplied by cost per unit .
Sales volume in year 2020= (100-10)% × sales figure for 2019
= 90% × 160,250= 144,225
Cost of goods sold per unit = cost of goods sold in 2019/Sales units in 2019
= 641,000/160250=$4
Cost of goods sold = $4× 144,225 = $576,900
Cost of goods sold = $576,900
Answer:
B. Both I and II are true.
Explanation:
<em> The average total cost of a given level of output is the slope of the line from the origin to the total cost curve at that level of output</em>
The average total cost is defined as the sum of all total costs divided by the quantity produced. In other words, the cost of one unit of production. The average cost curve as shown in the diagram is U-shaped, where it falls with economies of scale and later rises as diseconomies of scale sets in.
<em />
<em>The marginal cost of a given level of output is the slope of the line that is tangent to the total cost curve at that level of output</em>
Marginal cost is the change that occurs in the total cost when quantity produced increases by one unit. In other words, it is the cost of producing an additional unit of a good. As per the diagram, the slope of the line tangent to the TC (TC = AC x Q1) curve at Q1 is the firm's marginal cost at this output level.
Answer:
C. strictly liable for Will's injuries
Explanation:
In law, Strict liability is a situation when defendant is required to be responsible to a certain situation, but can't be considered as guilty to any violation.
There are two points that need to be highlighted from the case above:
1. Astor Manufacturing process has fulfilled all of its safety regulation for storing the dangerous product.
2. The dangerous product owned by Astor Manufacturing caused William's injury.
The regulations for hazard management is created by the government, and the leak is not caused by their negligence. It's caused by unexpected natural disaster. This is why we can't say that Astor is guilty to any violation.
But still, the chemical that they created injured William. The court will most likely force Astor to be responsible for all the medical expenses incurred by william.
