I'm pretty sure that the most suitable one is C. Renewed interest among students in the humanities
Answer:
a) are persons hired to attempt to influence members of Congress, d) represent special interests.
Explanation:
Lobbyists is a hired individual by an organization or interest group with the aim of influencing legislation or the outcome of an election. The use of the term can be traced back to the 1910's
Likely rule against Mark.
Mark and Charles had an oral agreement over a few years and nothing was put into writing. This would trigger the statute of frauds, wherein certain types of agreements are required to be memorialized in writing.
This means that there is a situation in which two people are having to be taken at their word. On top of that, the agreement was made while they were impaired.
If a court didn't rule against Mark at the outset, there would be an investigation into whether the agreement was enforceable, how impaired they were, whether anyone else heard them, and what the historic uses were but there isn't enough time for a prescriptive easement or adverse possession. But this is likely a summary judgment case based on statute of frauds.
