Answer:
Human and dog interaction
it’s a loving protective relationship
humans could change the amount of dogs that homeless and hungry they would take care of them and the population of dogs would go up, humans would be more protected and the dogs would live a good life
Explanation:
Mark as brainliest :)
Alexander the III, also known as Alexander the Great, was the King of the Ancient Greek empire of Macedonia. As a child, he was tutored by famed philosopher Aristotle and studied many subjects. After the death of his father, King Philip, Alexander took over as king and general of the exceptional Macedonian Army. As leader of the army, Alexander was undefeated in battle with his military prowess becoming a famous legend. His skills in battle led him to be able to stretch his empire all of the way to modern Africa, India, and Asia. He reigned from 336 to 326 BC.
To this day his military tactics and battles are studied making him one of the most famed military leaders that ever lived.
Answer:
Passive
Explanation:
Passive correlation can be defined as the way in which a child inherit a gene from his/her parent in which the child begins to act or behave exactly like the parents.
Passive correlation also means the relationship that exists between the child genotype which he inherit from the parent and the environment in which the child was been raised or brought up in which the heritable traits of the parent influence their family environment because of the relationship between the genotype a child inherits from his or her parents and the environment in which the child is raised. Parents create a home environment that is influenced by their own heritable traits because the gene or genotype the parent pass to the child often correlates with the environment.
Therefore according to the scenario it might best be described to be the result of a(n) PASSIVE G/E correlation because their is likelihood of the children to be academically successful if they inherit the Gene's of their parents.
Racism is a mentality. It is where a group of people use the race of another group as an excuse to treat them inferior. In many causes, it starts with one race separating a heinous act that a part of another race does and then apply it to the entire race as a whole. The problem with reducing racism to the actions and thoughts of people is we miss the big picture. Most people try to be good and fit in with society; however, some people can't do this because they don't understand why what they do/think is not socially acceptable. These people often think that they are in the right and those opposing them are in the wrong. A good example of this is the enslavement of Africans. There is a passage in the Bible that refers to Ham, the son of Noah, acting out against his father, and in return his skin gets blemished or darkened making him inferior and showing the crime he did against his father. This was the main excuse for enslavement of those with darker skin for generations, and if it was in their most sacred book, how could it possibly be wrong?
