Hello,
According to what I have read, this has been happening because every United States state is also a sovereign and independent entity in its own right and is granted the power to create and apply laws, and regulate them according to their needs. In addition, some laws, such as certain voting laws and criminal laws and statutes, tend to be somewhat uniform across states; nevertheless, some areas of law can be very, very different from one state to the next.
I think it's either A or D
It is false that because people involved in collective behavior do so anonymously and are swept up by the power of suggestion, they cannot legally be held responsible for their behavior.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Collective behavior is the behavior exhibited by particular group of people who tend to remain together for short lived social interactions. Any person can join in this as a member. During any religious revival meeting or showing their hatred towards norms that are contradictory, people join together collectively.
The social movements emerge due to some reasons then they face either success or failure and then after sometime they decline. Sometimes this collective behavior is swept by the power of suggestion involved in vandalism and riots which is a form of civil disorder.
The answer is: adapt to one's environment.
According to piaget, organisms with low intelligence tend to only recognize low variety way of living and unable to adapt to extreme change in environment. More often than not, this would make such organisms much more likely to extinct.
Intelligent organisms on the other hand, can adapt to extreme changes and had a very high likelihood to survive to the next generation. (humans for example can live in both cold north pole and hot dessert while no other organisms able to live in two completely different climate, indicating how good we are in adapting to our environment)
The defendant is not liable even if the plaintiff provides all the elements of negligence.
