Answer:
the axis labels are inconsistent with the graph title
Step-by-step explanation:
The independent variable is described as "% protein digested", and the dependent variable is described as "time." The graphed values suggest that these are reasonable descriptors for the data being plotted.
The title, however, says the data points are "percentage digestion per hour". This is in disagreement with the axis labels, and is inconsistent with the shape of the curve. (If the title is to be believed, the digestion rate is such that more than 100% of <whatever> has been digested after 10 hours.)
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
Another error is the vertical axis is graduated as though it were linear, but it is decidedly non-linear. Equivalent distances on the graph are shown for differences of 10%, 5%, 10% and 25%. That is the scale varies by a factor of 5 from one part of the graph to another.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
₹1000
Step-by-step explanation:
Let m represent the marked price. After the discount, the price is 0.80m. After the tax is added, the price is (0.80m)(1.13). This value is Rs 904, so the marked price is ...
(0.80m)(1.3) = ₹904
m = ₹904/(0.80×1.13) = ₹904/0.904
m ≈ ₹1000
The marked price of the watch is ₹1000.
The question is kind of vague in my opinion.
the best measurement to report with the scale in my opinion would be tens of pounds. my reasoning is because the decimal place would still prove importance with numbers under one hundred. above one hundred pounds and the decimal place becomes kind of pointless.
I hope I answered your question. though i'm sorry if i didn't
20 thousands would be 200 hundreds
The answer would be 30 since for 180 pounds and 60 feet you would need to divide 180 by 60 to get the unit rate for the pressure and then multiply by 10 which would get you 30. Correct me if I’m wrong. Hope it helps :)
