Answer:
Company should continue with old machine (Alternative 1)
Explanation:
Preparation of a differential analysis dated April 11 on whether to continue with the old machine (Alternative 1) or replace the old machine (Alternative 2)
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Continue with old machine(Alternative 1) ; Replace with old machine(Alternative 2); Differential effect on income
REVENUES
Proceeds from sale of machine
$0 $50500 $50500
COSTS
Purchase price $0 -$75000 -$75000
Direct labor -$56000 -$37000 19000
(11200*5 = -56000)
(7400*5 = -37000)
Income (loss) -$56000 -$61500 -$5500
Based on the above differential analysis the Company should continue with OLD MACHINE (Alternative 1)
Answer:
This means that receiving 9000 today is better for us as we will have more at the end of 6 years.
Explanation:
We need to first calculate what is the future value of payments in both scenarios. If we receive $9,000 today and invest it at 10% for 6 years we will have 9000*1.10^6=15,944
If we start reviving cash in 4 annual payments 2 years from now of $3000 we will have to find the future value of each individual payment and add them up.
First payment Future value = 3000*1.10^4=4392 (Money can be invested for 4 years at 10%)
Second payment future value = 3000*1.10^3=3993 (Money can be invested for 3 years at 10%)
Third payment future value = 3000*1.10^2=3630 (Money can be invested for 4 years at 10%)
Fourth payment future value = 3000*1.1=3300
Add them all up = 15315
This means that receiving 9000 today is better for us as we will have more at the end of 6 years.
Dr. Regan was hired to help retain employees by the Siri corporation without losing money and expectations. He was the one who suggested that employees could decorate their work spaces and this would help employees feel more comfortable where they have to work 8 or more hours per day. This then helped the company by people not calling in and less people quit their jobs. Dr. Regan was most likely an industrial and organizational psychologist. Many companies hires these types of psychologists to help their employees with stress at work and to put employees at ease.
Answer:
Courts Distributors and Eastinghouse Corporation
Dispute over Contract Price
The two parties have a legal contract. The contract was established when Courts requested Eastinghouse to send the refrigerators and bill later.
The exact price for the contract is in dispute. This dispute can be resolved between the parties. Reference to the market price will help resolve the dispute, otherwise, the parties may seek alternative dispute resolutions, like litigation, mediation, or arbitration.
Explanation:
a) Data and Analysis:
Eastinghouse's invoice price for the refrigerators = $140,000
Courts' adopted market price = $120,000
b) Since Courts' reference to the price is with regard to the wholesale market price, it may be that Eastinghouse quoted the retail price instead. Since Courts is a distributor, it has the right to be charged a wholesaler's price and not a retailer's. Therefore, we can conclude that after due reference to the prevailing market price of similar refrigerators, the two parties may agree to a price of $120,000 or a little higher.