Answer:
a. $2,465.82
b. $3,539.68
c. Yes, we should
Explanation:
Annual cost to maintain old forklift is $5,000
Equivalent Annual Cost (EAC) of new forklift = (Asset price x discount rate)/(1-(1+discount rate)-n), in which n is the number of year for usage of this forklift?
If discount rate is 4% per year, the EAC of new forklift is $2,465.82
= ($20,000x4%)/(1-(1+4%)-10)
If discount rate is 12% per year, the EAC of new forklift is $3,539.68
= ($20,000x12%)/(1-(1+12%)-10)
We should replace because with such above discount rate, the old forklift is more costly than the new one
Answer:
$11,175,000
Explanation:
The net sales of Siena Company for the last year shall be determined through following mentioned formula:
Net sales=Gross sales-sales returns and allowances-sales discounts
In the given question:
Gross sales=$11,720,000
Sales returns and allowances=$370,000
Sales discounts=$175,000
Net sales=$11,720,000-$370,000-$175,000=$11,175,000
Answer:
Strategic Giving
Explanation:
The strategy undertaken by Krafts foods is to serve a larger purpose to create a positive imagery in the minds of consumers. In order to fight against obesity Krafts develops a partnership to impact on the emotional aspect of their future consumers i.e Hispanic families.
Entering into new markets through strategic giving helps to establish positive image in the minds of their potential consumers.
Answer:
The battle of who should hold more power, the national government or the states, is perhaps the most seasoned battle in American history. Many believe that the states should hold more control over the national government, yet I differ sometimes. In the present society we have progressing banters about numerous points that worry general society. One of the huge issues that gets talked about frequently is whether maryjane ought to be authorized or not. I am fair with regards to this specific point, yet I do have a solid feeling on who ought to choose. At this moment, there are a few states around the nation that have authorized it, however the National government has not. This makes things incredibly confounding most definitely. The other concern I have is with the detained populace because of cannabis infringement. I think that its unjustifiable that there are individuals getting detainment charges for accomplishing something that another resident in a neighboring state is openly doing. I comprehend that individuals are worried about the possibility that that on the off chance that we permit the national government to settle on choices like this, at that point they will develop to be excessively ground-breaking, however I differ right now. There are measures set up to adjust the forces of the government, and we should confide in what the organizers had as a top priority when they drafted the constitution. At the point when they made the constitution, they gave the central government all the forces they figured they ought to have Article 1 area 8. They did this with the aim that they would shield the central government from getting excessively huge. The originators were clever people however, and they realized that the issues written in 1787 would not be the main ones to cross the ways of the American individuals. Considering this they included the "essential and legitimate statement", which was added to guarantee they could manage issues that emerged later on.
Answer:
Event II should probably get the most attention and Event III should probably get the least.
Explanation:
From the given information, we have an event, the probability and the cost. Event II has a probability of 0.2 and a cost of 53. This means that it should be given the utmost importance because the event has the highest cost among all other events.
On the flip side, Event III should probably get the least attention because the cost involved is the least. Event III has a probability of 0.1 and a cost of 12.
Therefore, Event II should probably get the most attention and Event III should probably get the least.
