1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_lady [41]
3 years ago
7

Which of the following would cause the value of a nation's GDP to increase in a given year?

Law
1 answer:
SIZIF [17.4K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

e

Explanation:

because I just took the test and you just need to know what gdp is

You might be interested in
Boyd files a suit in a federal district court against Cathy. Cathy loses the suit, appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
ikadub [295]

Answer:

not required to hear the case.

Explanation:

The United States Court of Appeals  is also known as the circuit courts that are the intermediate appellate courts. The US courts of appeals are one of the most powerful as well influential courts in America.

In the context, Boyd flies a case against Cathy in the federal district court where Cathy loses the case. She then makes an appeal to the circuit courts or the United States Court of Appeals for a second circuit but she loses again. Now if Cathy moves to the Supreme Court of the U.S. and makes an appeal, the Supreme Court is not required to hear Cathy's case as she already made an appeal in the Court of Appeals of U.S. and The court has made his judgement.

4 0
3 years ago
A father kicks out his seventeen year old son a week before his eighteenth birthday, the school is notified, nothing is done and
prohojiy [21]

Answer: he should tell the judge that he kicked  me out one week before i turned  18 and he also kicked my 15 year old his way younger  than me and he still kicked him out and we both live with our grandma now.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do independent regulatory agencies influence the U.S. government?
Alexxx [7]

Answer:

I would say the answer is c

Explanation:

hope this helps and plz give me brainlist :)

5 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS!!! For this project, you have the opportunity to be the author and write brief newspaper arti
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.

Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.

This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.

Overview of Public Nuisance Law

In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.

Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]

Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases

Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is TRUE of the Supreme Court?
MAVERICK [17]

Answer: A

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 10 - MIJ COMPREHENSIVE SCIENCE 2 - 1ST 9 WEEKS -CR
    12·1 answer
  • The principle that state governments and the federal government work together to devlop national policies is know as
    11·1 answer
  • How to you think race is or is not related to the police use of force? What do you base your opinion upon?
    14·1 answer
  • Anybody gonna see joker with a trenchcoat and le ak forti seven?
    12·2 answers
  • In a dictatorship the citizens of a country are persecuted if any attempt is made to criticize the government in power. The abov
    14·1 answer
  • The term "uppers" refers to .<br> A. depressants<br> B. stimulants.<br> C. sedatives.
    14·1 answer
  • 4.<br> What is a substrate control? Why is it done?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a good indication that a website information is questionable
    14·1 answer
  • What political party or interest group do you think will best help you achieve your goal? Explain why you chose this group and w
    7·1 answer
  • in which of the following areas did regional interests and perspectives have the least impact on national policy?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!