1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
a_sh-v [17]
3 years ago
15

The Treaty of Versailles brought an end to

Social Studies
1 answer:
seraphim [82]3 years ago
4 0
The treaty of Versailles was the most important of the peace treaties that brought World War 1 to an end. The treaty ended the state of war between Germany and the Allied Powers.
You might be interested in
Leticia, a graduate student in psychology, has conducted a research study that has confirmed her hypothesis that helping behavio
Julli [10]

Answer:

statistically significant  

Explanation:

Statistically significant: In statistics, the term "statistically significant" is described as a result that doesn't attribute to any chance. Significantly, it refers to the process that states if a "null hypothesis" is being true i.e, no difference exists then there's a very low chance or probability of obtaining or getting a large or a larger result.

In the question above, the given statement represents a statistically significant result.

3 0
2 years ago
Tony, who is 4 years older than Frank, is explaining the rules of a game to him. Frank is paying close attention, but Tony is ta
tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

Working memory

Explanation:

Working memory:

Working memory is very important in a human being cognition. Working memory is related to when we try to remember the phone numbers, shopping list and set of information. It is the capacity of mind that holds and manipulates the information into the mind. It is part of the central functioning of the mind. This memory is related to our general information related to our academics and our intelligence. There is a debate till now on the storage capacity of the working memory. Some researchers believed that it has a limited capacity. It can store some chunks, numbers, etc but others believed that it has unlimited resources.

6 0
3 years ago
The first time Megan had to install a ceiling fan in her new home, it took a long time. But later when she helped install a ceil
amid [387]
It can be attributed to her learning how to do it at her own home
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged to the laws of civil society, locke invokes the notion of
marissa [1.9K]

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged

to the laws of civil society, Locke invokes the notion of "tacit consent." Rawls, who is also a "social contract theorist," of sorts, argues that a social contract can arise only from "hypothetical consent." What is the difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawls's notion of hypothetical consent?

a) Tacit consent requires actually expressing one's consent to the terms of the contract, whereas hypothetical consent simply requires that a citizen would have given consent under certain ideal conditions.

b) One who gives tacit consent implies consent to the terms of the contract through her actions, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent offers her explicit word on the basis of her particular desires.

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

d) Tacit consent is consent given in the state of nature, whereas hypothetical consent occurs within an ideal society.

e) Tacit consent is consent given by any rational agent, irrespective of her particular desires or ends, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent agrees to the terms of the contract based on some particular desire that she has.

Answer:

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Explanation:

The major difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawl's notion of hypothetical consent is that unlike tacit consent, someone that hypothetically consents means that the person would have likely consented to the terms of the contract if she was asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Tacit consent involves implicitly suggesting through actions that she accepts the terms of the contract.

5 0
3 years ago
Sociology social interaction, social phenomena anthropology psychology economics political science history sociological perspect
Nata [24]
3. Sociological perspective
11.sociology
12. Social welfare
16. Karl Marx
19. Political science
20. Psychology
21. perspective
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • it is believed that in the past all of the continents were joined together in one large landform called
    12·2 answers
  • Which principle of democracy does the government described in the passage most directly represent
    12·2 answers
  • In Egypt who was the leader
    10·1 answer
  • If a nation can produce a good or service at a lower cost than any other nation, what can you say about this nation?
    9·1 answer
  • Question 1 of 94
    7·2 answers
  • Why did many people In the United States want to avoid war after World War One
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Traditions are<br> a. consistent<br> b. a way of doing things<br> C. round<br> d. none of these
    7·2 answers
  • 27. Which came first, the federal constitution or state constitutions?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following indicates that are physical chang has occurred
    10·1 answer
  • Why is decision necessary.​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!