Answer:
Read the Explanation.
Explanation:
He supported Populism and liberalism, although it was mainly for white Americans. He also expanded the country and gave the US more land.
However, he expelled Native Americans from their native land, some examples are the Cherokee, Seminole, etc. He also supported slavery, although he was generally more moderate and was not exactly "Pro-Slavery.
So, we can say that Andrew Jackson's presidency had taught us not to expell natives from their land, as it is very harmful for the native population.
However, he did support the idea of populism and liberalism, although he only really supported it for whites.
The correct answer is schema; accommodation
For Piaget, in the brain maturation process, schemas are produced, defined as mental molds in which we place our experiences. In other words, schemas are structures or concepts that we use to interpret and organize the information we receive.
Accommodation occurs when a person's existing mental structure is called a schema. Within psychology, accommodation is a component of Jean Piaget's process of adaptation and cognitive development.
Answer: Option B. Related and overlapping disciplines.
Explanation:
IG is a sort of super discipline that encompasses a variety of key concepts from a variety of related and overlapping disciplines. IG is how a company or organizations protects security, complies with regulations and laws, and meets moral standards when managing information. IG is a strategic framework composed of standards, processes, roles, that hold organizations and individuals accountable to organize, secure and maintain information in ways that align with and contribute to the organization's goal.
Answer:
As a peninsula, the people of Greece took advantage of living by the sea. The mountains in Greece did not have fertile soil good for growing crops, like in Mesopotamia, but the mild climate allowed for some farming. The Greeks, like many other ancient civilizations, felt deeply connected to the land they lived on.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is "Option b".
Explanation:
Logically, the replacement of rule is the rule of substitution that could only lead to a specific part of the logical expression, it is identical phrases will start replacing each other within the structure of valid logic.
- It is the probabilistic reasoning, replacement laws are applicable to manipulate initiatives.
- This rule of inference is being used only for the whole linear combination, that can be substituted by a rule of substitution.
