Answer:
I would go with A War
Desired to be reunited with family is not forced
Slumping economy is not forced it is a choice
If the government were to force migation it would not provide an incentive, it would simple be the government made you
Explanation:
It destroyed ancient cultures after the conquest of other regions. They were the largest empire in the ancient world, and swallowed up any civilization around it, making them the main ancient civilization power in the ancient world.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Portugal and France
Explanation:
Portugal was losing land in South America to Spain, so it looked up North. France had areas in the same continent.
Answer:
It's goal was to secure Independence from the North.
Explanation:
Its initial goal was to secure Independence from the North. While its mid-war goal became to reunite states with a Union in which slavery was not allowed. The war from beginning to end would be a noble crusade for democracy for all people, not just in America, but throughout the world.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
examples of positive and negative effects of the military regime
The positives are that a military regime is so discipline and strict enough to make people focus and work under heavy scrutiny and supervision to accomplish goals. Many times this is the only path to start to do more and better things, with discipline, perseverance, and order. That is exactly why strict disciplined, without flexibility, is referred to as military discipline. Let's have in mind that soldiers have no room for flexibility, thinking, or feedback. Soldiers simply follow orders and directions.
For instance, General Douglass McArthur's military regime after World War in Japan, trying to help Japan to reconstruct after the two atomic bomb explosions. His military planning goals, plus the focused discipline of the Japanese, made Japan a modern superpower in just a few years.
On the other hand, the negatives. People are no soldiers and like to enjoy their liberties. Under a military regime, there are no liberties. The military is in full command. Many times, under this type of regime, liberties are suppressed or controlled. THis is the opposite of a democracy.
We can see many examples of military regimes in the Middle East and Africa. People have no liberties and many times tyrannic military dictators oppress the citizens.