Answer:
The data are at the
<u>Nominal</u> level of measurement.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The objective here is to Identify the level of measurement of the data, and explain what is wrong with the given calculation.
a)
The data are at the <u> Nominal </u> level of measurement due to the fact that it portrays the qualitative levels of naming and representing different hierarchies from 100 basketball, 200 basketball, 300 football, 400 anything else
b) We are being informed that, the average (mean) is calculated for 597 respondents and the result is 256.1.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement. At nominal level this type of data set do not measure at all , it is not significant to compute their average (mean).
Answer:
No, I haven't taken the isat.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The rule is to multiply the numbers on the X side by 3
Step-by-step explanation:
brainlyiest?
Answer:
21 more mugs were brought this year than last year.
Step-by-step explanation:
We can solve by subtracting the initial amount of mugs from the final amount of mugs.
To find the amount of mugs hung up this year, we will use the equation: m = 12w where m = the number of mugs & w = the number of wooden hangers. The 12 represents the amount of mugs per wooden hanger.
We can plug in 3 for w since 3 wooden hangers were filled up and we would get 12(3) = m = 36 mugs
Now we subtract last year's total mugs hung up from this year's total mugs hung up.
We end up with 36 - 15 = 21
