Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient between the variables h(height in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) is 0.202
Sample size n=40
Level of significane alpha = 0.01
Create null and alternate hypothesis as:
H0: r=0
Ha: r not equal 0
(Two tailed test at 1% significance level)
Sample r = 0.202
r difference = 0.202
test statistic t = 
df =n-2 =38
t critical value for 0.01 and df =38 is 2.704
Since our test statistic lies below 2.704, we accept null hypothesis
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
You could write 6/15 as a decimal 0.40.
Therefore .48>.40

Parallel lines have the same slope.
The given line has a slope of 3, therefore, the line parallel to the given line has a slope of 3.
Now, we have the slope of the line and a point that it passes through.
So, we can use the Point-Slope formula:







The answer is x>0 on apex for x value
The difference in temperatures is 54+12, so the difference is 66