Answer:
you are correct and pls dont delete this anwser if i get it wrong side B
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
If today is not Thursday, then tomorrow is not Friday.
Step-by-step explanation:
I presume this is the answer off other peoples responses on the same question elsewhere.... next time include the whole question.
Answer:
See the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Statement </u><u> </u><u> Reason</u>
1.∠1 and ∠2 are supplementary angles --- Given
2. m∠1 + m∠2 = 180° --- Linear pair, they are supplementary
3. m∠1 and m∠3 are supplementary angles -- m∠1 + m∠3= 180
(Supplementary angles add upto 180 degrees)
4. m∠1 and m∠3 ------ Exterior sides in opposite rays
5. m∠1 + m∠2 = m∠1 + m∠3 ------ Transitive property
6. m∠2 = m∠3 -------------- Subtraction property
7. l || m ------------- If two lines are cut by transversal the alternative interior
angles are the same, then the lines are paralle.
Thank you.
Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
You can check whether the ratios form a proportion, by setting one piece of the ratios as x
Thus, we can use the equation 4/3.2=22/x.
From this, we get 4x=70.4.
Solving for x gives us 17.6.
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
