The answer is a scientific law
This is an example or description of "a<span>rgument against the person, abusive".</span>
It is a wrong
argumentative methodology whereby original discourse of the current subject is dodged
by rather assaulting the character, intention, or other quality of the
individual making the contention, or people related with the contention, as
opposed to countering the substance of the contention itself. Usually known as “Ad
hominem”.
Answer: He made a risky gamble
Explanation: John Law made a bet with Lord Londonderry in August 1719 that East India Company stock would weaken over the following year. He lost the bet. It was this wager and not the collapse of the Mississippi bubble that ruined Law. On 28 December 1720, he fled France disguised as a woman and died in Venice nine years later, a poor man.
The answer is : The demand would most likely increasing
Phrases such as "all boots must go" tend to be used if the businesses want to restock its warehouse with new products. Because of this, it is very likely that they would sell the boots under a huge discount. According to the law of demand, this decrease in price would increase the number of demand from consumers.
That we have become a permanent gender role in the society( I guess so....)
