Answer:
5. 1
6. Kari is not correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
5. All like terms can be combined. There will be one term remaining after they are.
___
6. The appropriate factoring is x(x+1). This is not the same as x(2x+1).
In order to show equivalence, you need to show that the expressions produce the same result for as many different values of x as the degree of the expression plus 1. That is, you'd need to show equivalence for <em>3 different values of x</em>, as a minimum for this second-degree expression.
Answer:
The last table given See attached image)
Step-by-step explanation:
Notice that they are asking for the inverse function to the one with the detailed relationship given. The original relationship was assigning to the Domain of number of people attending, the Range of values for charges.
Therefore, the inverse function will be assigning in the opposite way: from the average charges (now the Domain of this relationship), to the number of people attending (now the Range of this relationship). The relationship should also maintain the original element to element connection:
What was:
(20, $10) should now be ($10, 20)
(26, $6.25) should now be ($6.25, 26)
(35, $4) should now be ($4, 35)
This is exactly represented by the last table (see also image attached)
Answer:
-12/5
Step-by-step explanation:
-4 * 9 = -36 (numerator)
3 * 5 = 15 (denominator)
Take 3 out of both to simplify.
-36/3 = -12
15/3 = 5
Final Answer:
-12/5
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
16*12 is 192. Plus the 6 for the bride and groom, and you get a total of 198.
Answer:
2(x-9)(x+5)
Step-by-step explanation: