Answer:
(b) a loss of $750
Explanation:
Given;
Amount of spice mixture to be purchased = 1500 pounds
Price of spice mixture in 2014 = $5.00 per pound
Changed price of sugar mixture = $4.50 per pound
Now,
The amount to be received on the day of contract in 2014
= Amount of spice mixture to be purchased × Price of spice mixture in 2014
= 1500 × $5.00
= $7,500
and,
The amount to be received in 2015
= Amount of spice mixture to be purchased × Price of spice mixture in 2015
= 1500 × $4.50
= $6,750
The difference in Expected amount and the amount to be received
= $7500 - $6750
= $750
Since the amount to be received is less than the expected amount on the day of contract
Therefore,
a loss will be recognized
Hence,
the correct answer is option (b) a loss of $750
Answer:
The CVP income statement would report a contribution margin $220000.
Explanation:
CVP income statement
sales $480000
total variable cost ($260000)
contribution margin $220000
total fixed expenses ($150000)
operating income $70000
Therefore, The CVP income statement would report a contribution margin $220000.
Answer:
Total amount available in two years is $1,354,125.
Explanation:
The total amount available in two years can be calculated as follows:
Total amount in the deposit now = Current deposit + Amount planned to be deposited = $650,000 + $200,000 = $850,000
Future value of the total amount the deposit now = Total amount in the deposit now * (1 + Annual interest rate)^Number of years the deposit used = $850,000 + (1 + 15%)^2 = $1,124,125
Future value of next year's deposit = Next year's deposit * (1 + Annual interest rate)^Number of years the deposit used = $200,000 * (1 + 15%)^1 = $230,000
Total amount available in two years = Future value of the total amount the deposit now + Future value of next year's deposit = $1,124,125 + $230,000 = $1,354,125
Answer:
The correct option is is A, predatory pricing
Explanation:
Predatory pricing is an illegal approach to pricing where a firm fixes a very low price in order to send competitors out of business.
This is very applicable to a firm that has economies of scale where its cost per unit reduces as more and more units are produced, making it possible to undercut competitors without feeling much impact in profitability.
This approach is against the anti-trust law as it paves for a monopoly market,where only one firm operating in the market determines the price which is not likely to be favorable to consumers
Answer:
The answer is c:
Enforceable via employee agent
Explanation:
The definition of agency law deals with agent-principal relationships; that is a relationship where one party has the legal authority to act in place of another. Relationships that are commonly associated with agency law include employer-employee, administrator-decedent or executor, and guardian-ward.
Agreements that result in the formation of agency-type relationships can be implied or express, and both the principal and the agent can be an entity (such as partnership or corporation) or individual.
Here in the given situation, since, Elaine is an employee of the business and knowledgeable enough to deal with the contract filing, it is implied that she is acting as an employee agent, that she can help the customer in filing the contract.
