Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
Answer: A) need not disclose that fact to the clients
Explanation: An investment adviser representative need not disclose the fact that he/she uses third-party research to formulate portfolio to the clients and the reason is this: It is not necessary to disclose what sources an investment adviser representative uses as the basis for portfolio recommendations, and thus is never in violation of his fiduciary responsibility. However, if the third-party research used is to be distributed to his clients, then, proper attribution is required.
<span>Because the statute penalizes the person committing the crime as well as the employer whose employee committed the crime, Chris can be held liable, and the company that we works for (Watkins) can be held vicariously liable under the statute.</span>
Id say its A, because entrepreneurs start a business to make a profit.
Answer:
Explanation:
They are hurt because cotton is one of their exports and a developing nations needs to be able to make money from them so if a big country takes away one of their main exports it will hurt their economy.
