Ok I will answer the question, give me 1 hour to answer the question
This argument is based on "the linguistic relativity hypothesis".
The hypothesis of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a dialect influences its speakers' reality view or discernment. Prevalently known as the Sapir– Whorf theory, or Whorfianism, the standard is regularly characterized to incorporate two forms. The solid form says that dialect decides thought and that etymological classifications confine and decide intellectual classifications, while the feeble adaptation says that phonetic classifications and use just impact thought and choices.
people like archaeologists because they explain the mysteries of what it means to being a human being. the dicoveries provide what happen in the past and presents they also collect infromation that can guide the furture of humanity
they are exciting because they dicover somthing that happen many years ago and they made history
it is fun being arch because they get to travel around the world
hope this help you please give me a heart
and leave a comment
Answer:
Rationalization.
Explanation:
Rationalization is explained here as an ego defense mechanism that people use to make excuses for situations or events in their lives that they do not like. This is seen here as Bruce's case because he is vehemently trying to turn the irrational in his present situation to rational. People use it often when they are angry, depressed, scared or hurt.
The mechanism usually works negatively to make the person feel worse about the situation or event rather than better. Rationalization is a type of cognitive distortion.
In cases like this when people rationalize, they turn irrational things into rational.
