Answer:
(D)Lucita's estimate is too high.
After plotting the data from the table, with the number of times sick per year as a function of the number of apples eaten per week, I can conclude that there is no definite correlation between the two variables. This is because the data points do not have a good fit with any trend, meaning the R-squared value is low. Thus, the number of apples eaten per week has no significant effect on the number of times the people listed get sick per year.
Answer:
$21
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply 7 by 3, since it increased $3 each week for 7 weeks:
7(3)
= $21
So, the total change in the price of a share of stock was $21
