Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
20
Step-by-step explanation:
6 + 2 = 8
8 + 3 = 11
11 + 4 =15
15 + 5 =20
Answer:
y to 0.78y is a decrease
Step-by-step explanation:
y by itself can also be written as 1y, and 0.78y is less than 1, thus y to 0.78y is a decrease.
You’re absolutely amazing and I really appreciate that you’re trying to help others! And if you need anything yourself please feel free to ask :)
Hi there!
------------------------
question - A 36-foot flagpole casts a 10 3/4 foot shadow, while the hospital nearby casts a 37 5/8 foot shadow. Find the height of the hospital
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
if you correctly work this out the answer is:
The height of the hospital is 35 3/4 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------
Have a nice day!
