The correct answers to these open questions are the following.
Maple Farms, Inc. v. City School District of Elmira.
Could something like this bankrupt a company?
Yes, it can, if the proper forecast were not done taking into consideration all of the possible variables at medium and long-range.
Do you agree with the decision?
It was a tough decision because the court declared in its decision that the performance was not impracticable, as Maple Farm Inc indicated when decided to break the contract.
In strict theory, I agree with the court's decision because the explanation was that an "impractical" occurred when an event happened totally unexpected. And in this case, Mapple Farm Inc could have taken extra provisions knowing that milk had a 10% increase the last year and had the chance of more increases in the present year.
That is how a company can avoid this type of situation. Taking better provisions, contemplating all kinds of variables, knowing that in the future, something unexpected can happen and could be prevented with the proper forecast.
In this case, the assessed value is 28% from the market value. So, we need to get 28% from $123,000.
Expressed in figures, we have;
*$123,000 x 0.28 = $34,440.
The assessed value of Greg's home is $34,440, which is 28% of $123,000.
Answer:
E. He is not accounting for the new consumers who will benefit from being able to consume the product.
Explanation:
With the increase in price of product, Demand equals Supply i.e., no shortage exists in the market. Thus, the equilibrium level is achieved at price of $ 10. Further, The most important advantage of increasing the price in the given question is that shortage which exists earlier no longer remains now which will benefit all the consumers including some new consumers as they will able to get the sufficient number of quantities of product for the consumption now. Financial Head of Firm is ignoring the new consumers who will benefit from able to consume the product.
Therefore, He is not accounting for the new consumers who will benefit from able to consume the product.
Answer:
1-a.
in order to determine the present value of option a we can look for the PVIFA (annuity factor) for 24% / 12 = 2% monthly rate and 25 payments.
PVIFA = 19.523
Present value of the 25 payments = $540 x 19.523 = $10,542.42
+
Present value of final payment = $10,000 / (1 + 24%)²⁵/¹² = $6,388.10
PV = $16,930.52
Present value of option b = $16,638
1-b.
- b. option b (lower present value)
Capico will need credit for Research and development as it should research on the new drug and also study about its competitors
