F(5) = -4(25) - 3 = -100 -3 = -103
answer
f(5) = -103
g(-5) = 3(-5) - 1 = -15 -1 = -16
answer
g(-5) = -16
Okay so just put the 4 in for x
and multiply
Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:

The alternative hypothesis is:

If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
I think it would be B hope it helps
Answer:
x >>>>>>>> f(x)
–9 >>>>>> 10
–7 >>>>>>> 0
0 >>>>>>>> –35
5 >>>>>>>> –60
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = –5(x + 7)
1. x = –9, f(x) =?
f(x) = –5(x + 7)
f(x) = –5(–9 + 7)
f(x) = –5(–2)
f(x) = 10
2. f(x) = 0, x =?
f(x) = –5(x + 7)
0 = –5(x + 7)
Divide both side by –5
0 / –5 = x + 7
0 = x + 7
Collect like terms
x = 0 – 7
x = –7
3. x = 0, f(x) =?
f(x) = –5(0 + 7)
f(x) = –5(7)
f(x) = –35
4. f(x) = –60, x =?
f(x) = –5(x + 7)
–60 = –5(x + 7)
Divide both side by –5
–60 / –5 = x + 7
12 = x + 7
Collect like terms
x = 12 – 7
x = 5
SUMMARY:
x >>>>>>>> f(x)
–9 >>>>>> 10
–7 >>>>>>> 0
0 >>>>>>>> –35
5 >>>>>>>> –60