Answer: Option A
Explanation:
One of the main reason for proposals is to propose a potential solution to a problem, or an analysis of a potential solution to a problem or a proposed plan of maintaining a system. It is actually meant to convince your clients or stakeholders about the success of such proposal.
So option A doesn't explain why we have proposals not to convince your clients that a problem exist, there won't be a proposal without a problem been identified ,it is not to justify the existence of a problem ,but we have proposals to prove a solution to a system.
<u>Yes, if he breaks any of the laws of nature, because these are the moral laws for Hobbes.
</u>
Violating the laws of nature can be not performing one's valid pacts as a ruler or not seeking peace when others want to do so and also not being grateful.
Moral limits that Hobbes places on the ruler are useless, because when we make a pact with the ruler, we give all of our natural rights away to the sovereign.
We cannot question/revolt because they've our rights.
Can only act if we are in danger ⇒ right to self - defense
The answer you are looking for is a fixation.
Answer:
C. Someone who damages another person's property must pay back its value.
<u><em>Your Welcome! :D </em></u>