Answer:
I'm a bit stu pid can you explain better? I think is be able to answer it
Answer:
Macroeconomics deals with the economy as a whole and so deals with how variables such as government spending and interest rates will affect the entire economy not just single entities.
Microeconomics on the other hand, deals with individual entities in the economy and how various variables and decision making will affect them.
A nation prints more money, causing inflation. MACROECONOMICS.
This affects the entire nation not just single entities so it is macroeconomics.
A local store has a buy one, get one free sale. MICROECONOMICS.
This relates to the actions of a single entity in the economy so falls under microeconomics.
Oil production decreases, and gas prices rise nationwide. MACROECONOMICS.
As this concerns the entire nation, it is therefore under the realm of Macroeconomics.
Answer:
In 1debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise. It had four parts: first, California would enter the Union as a free state; second, the status of slavery in the rest of the Mexican territory would be decided by the people who lived there; third, the slave trade (but not slavery) would be abolished in Washington, D.C.; and fourth, a new Fugitive Slave Act would enable Southerners to reclaim runaway slaves who had escaped to Northern states where slavery was not allowed.
Bleeding Kansas
But the larger question remained unanswered. In 1854, Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas proposed that two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, be established in the Louisiana Purchase west of Iowa and Missouri. According to the terms of the Missouri Compromise, both new states would prohibit slavery because both were north of the 36º30’ parallel. However, since no Southern legislator would approve a plan that would give more power to “free-soil” Northerners, Douglas came up with a middle ground that he called “popular sovereignty”: letting the settlers of the territories decide for themselves whether their states would be slave or free.
Northerners were outraged: Douglas, in their view, had caved to the demands of the “slaveocracy” at their expense. The battle for Kansas and Nebraska became a battle for the soul of the nation. Emigrants from Northern and Southern states tried to influence the vote. For example, thousands of Missourians flooded into Kansas in 1854 and 1855 to vote (fraudulently) in favor of slavery. “Free-soil” settlers established a rival government, and soon Kansas spiraled into civil war. Hundreds of people died in the fighting that ensued, known as “Bleeding Kansas.”
A decade later, the civil war in Kansas over the expansion of slavery was followed by a national civil war over the same issue. As Thomas Jefferson had predicted, it was the question of slavery in the West–a place that seemed to be the emblem of American freedom–that proved to be “the knell of the union.”
Answer: A tariff
Explanation: America buys goods from china to be brought over to the us
Answer:
The one-child policy was the population control policy in force in the People's Republic of China from 1979 to 2015, whereby each couple was only allowed to have one child; having a second child was punishable. The aim of this policy was to slow down population growth.
The economic and social consequences of the Chinese one-child policy could severely limit the Chinese economy and society, partly because of the rapidly increasing aging population as a result of this policy. That is why the one-child policy was increasingly abandoned. For example, two out of three Chinese families were later allowed to have two children.
However, it had positive effects in terms of maintaining the country's natural resources, as it somewhat curbed their massive consumption.
In India, another country with 1 billion inhabitants, a two-child policy was pursued, but due to the high illiteracy, little has happened.
