$4,050, i got that by adding up each size than subtracting the totals
Yes if you actually try to become them
Answer:
The correct answer is that: informants are difficult to control and the police can not trust in them always.
Explanation:
To begin with, if the police officer finds out that the informant went behind his back and purchase drug then the officer must understand that the informant is not trustful and moreover<u> he could mean a risk to the whole undercover operation</u> that the police officer is managing, therefore that the scenario is propounding that situations like that exemplify that informants can not be trusted due to the fact that they are ex convicted and that is why the officers have to be carefull when working with them.
One thing that can cause a shift in the demand curve is a change in one of the determinants of demand.
The law of demand can be shown as Pat wants to buy more candy bars at $1 than at $2
<h3>What does the law of demand say?</h3><h3 />
The law of demand posits that people will demand more of a good when the price is lower as opposed to when it is higher. This is why Pat will want to buy more candy bars when the price is lower at $1 as opposed to $2.
The demand curve will shift when there is a change in one of the determinant of demand such as the income of people and the price of substitutes.
Find out more on the law of demand at brainly.com/question/24500422
#SPJ1
Answer:
$364,980
Explanation:
Computation for the amount of under- or overapplied overhead for the year.
First step is to calculate the
Predetermined Overhead using this formula
Predetermined Overhead rate = Estimated overhead/direct labor estimated
Let plug in the formula
Predetermined Overhead rate= 358,900/227,000
Predetermined Overhead rate= 158% of direct labor cost
Now let determine the Overhead applied
Overhead applied = $231,000*158%
Overhead applied= $364,980
Therefore the amount of under- or overapplied overhead for the year is $364,980
