Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
Explanation:
This discussion about organizations monitoring employee behavior can be related to ethical and unethical issues.
The ideal is for the company to have a set of well-defined policies and procedures with regard to the rights and duties of employees, as long as the policies have ethical and legal foundations, which guarantee the right to privacy and human integrity.
Therefore, the monitoring of the employee's behavior must always be related to their functions, and to the fulfillment of internal policies.
The gross value is the product minus the costs of raw materials and energy. Gross value allows a company to see the true value they are gaining after the raw materials and time spent to produce the good are complete. The value is an economic measure that allows a company to see where they stand after the contribution of materials and workers are taken out of the equation.
