Answer:
This question lacks options, options are:
A. The just-world hypothesis
B. Diffusion of responsibility
C. Deindividuation
D. Groupthink
The correct answer is B.
Explanation:
Diffusion of responsibility occurs when people have to make a decision, but wait for other people to do it first, that is, it is the phenomenon by which a person feels less responsible for intervening in an emergency to help the victim when there are other people present than when he/she is the only witness. The reasoning that inhibits helping behavior is that surely someone else will help. Diffusion of responsibility focuses on the fact that when there are multiple observers, the responsibility is divided among all and as a result no one helps.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Compound interest refers to the interest charged on both the amount borrowed and previous interest
The greater the number of compounding periods within a year, then (1) the future value of a lump sum investment at Time 0 not necessarily is greater and (2) the present value of a given lump sum to be received at some future date not necessarily is smaller.
Therefore, the given statement is false.
Answer:
Growth becomes pale and development far from the environment.
Explanation:
For there to be any form of development in a society or residents, there has to be an allowable form of freedom from some evil practices. An example is security. No business can thrive in an environment that is not secure, this would make investors take their money elsewhere to a safer location, than build their business there and burglars come to attack it or prevent it's client from operating freely in the location the business was planted. Another example is unfair consideration of cost of items which are sold, especially of the cost of the product or service is way more over the quality of the product or service, this would hinder growth of the society, as individuals residing won't enjoy the extortion they are being made to pay from.
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> this</u></em><em><u> helps</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
Truth-in-sentencing laws aim to preserve the time sentence set for criminals at the time of their conviction. Advocates of these policies argue that when an individual is sentenced for 5 to 7 years and ends up getting released after serving 3 or 4, it constitutes deception and <u>a disservice to "the public's right to know"</u>.
Since 1994 in the U.S., the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act started giving out additional funding as an incentive to states that <u>ensure criminals convicted of violent crimes serve </u><u>at least 85% of their sentence</u><u>. Up until 2008, 35 of the 50 states have kept up these standards.</u>
Hope this helps!
1. <span>C.) Lieutenant Governor
2. </span><span>D.) corporate sponsorship and ticket sales.
Hope I helped!</span>
