Answer:
B. narrow, have been unemployed for 15 weeks or more weeks.
Explanation:
Unemployment rate refers to the percentage of the total labor force in an economy, who are unemployed but seeking to be gainfully employed. The unemployment rate is divided into various types, these include;
I. Natural Rate of Unemployment (NU).
II. Frictional unemployment rate (FU).
III. Structural unemployment rate (SU).
IV. Actual unemployment rate (AU).
V. Cyclical unemployment rate (CU).
There are different measures used in the measurement of the unemployment rate in a country's economy and these includes;
I. U-1: this is the percentage of people that are unemployed for at least 15 weeks or more.
II. U-2: this is the percentage of the people who have lost their job or the people that finished a temporary job.
U-1 is a more narrow measure of unemployment rate than the conventional U-3 measure and U-1 counts as unemployed workers who have been unemployed for 15 weeks or more weeks.
The number of units that Starling Co. sold was 11200
<u>Explanation:</u>
Given -
Operating income = $28,800
Fixed cost = $38,400
Selling price of one unit = $12
Variable cost = $12
Number of units sold, n = ?
Contribution margin per unit = $18 - $12
= $6


Therefore, number of units that Starling Co. sold was 11200
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Retained earnings are the net earnings of an entity accumulated over time after payment of dividend. It is that part of earnings that is retain for expansion by the entity.
Generally, retained earnings are not changed by direct posting except it is prior year adjustment. in some entities, the amount that is transferred to retained earnings is system generated. Most transactions that affect retained earnings are debited or credited to account which ultimately affects retained earnings
______________________________
<h3>LEASING:</h3><h3>= $25,000 × 4 Years</h3><h3>= $100,000</h3><h3>= 10% × $25,000 ÷ 100 - $25,000</h3><h3>= $22,500 × 4 Years</h3><h3>= <u>$90,000</u></h3><h3 /><h3>BUYING:</h3><h3>= $60,000 + $40,000</h3><h3>= $100,000</h3><h3>= 10% × $10,000 ÷ 100 - $10,000</h3><h3>= $9,000 × 4 Years</h3><h3>= $36,000 + $60,000</h3><h3>= <u>$</u><u>9</u><u>6</u><u>,000</u></h3>
<h3>LEASING IS A BETTER OPTION</h3>
______________________________
Answer:
A difference between a perfectly competitive market equilibrium and a perfect price discrimination equilibrium is that in a competitive market <u>marginal cost equals marginal revenue</u>, whereas in perfect price discrimination <u>marginal cost does not equal marginal revenue.</u>
Explanation:
In a perfectly competitive market, equilibrium is only possible when marginal revenue equals marginal cost and marginal revenue curve is cut by the marginal cost curve from below.
Contrariwise, in a perfect discrimination, equilibrium is achieved irrespective of the nature of marginal cost; whether rising, constant or falling.