Answer:
(a) $190,000
(b) $2,185,000
(c) $3,125,900
(d) $841,090
(e) $561,260
(f) $1,200,000
Explanation:
Rainier and Yakima Company several balances are omitted. These are calculated with reverse calculation. The material inventory at beginning of may is added with the purchases made and then ending inventory is subtracted to identify cost of goods manufactured.
Answer:
D. The Self-efficacy of employees.
Explanation:
Self-efficacy refers to what you believe about yourself, rather than how you truly are. An employee with low self-efficacy runs the risk of performing tasks below her actual ability level because she believes she can only perform to that level, and she may not recognize her aptitude to do the work.
Organizational leaders and performance managers use the term self-efficacy to describe an individuals' belief in their own ability to successfully complete a task. ... All employees should be assigned tasks that are the best possible fit for their knowledge, skills, and abilities.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
<u>Answer</u>:
<u>Should create a non disclosure agreement policy</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
This is a legally binding agreement that mandates parties to a contract in this case between an employer with an employee, in which the employee agrees not to disclose publicly or to any one negative information about the company that is deemed confidential (secret or private), and that may affect the company negatively.
Thus, to reduce the worries of the board and CEO, Joanie should create a non disclosure agreement signed by employees.
