Answer:
Even though black nationalism helped the abolition of race segregation, its role in modernity is only commemorative. It is also irrelevant and would propitiate racial segregation because it only looks to empower one minority and separate it from the rest. Because it does what it looked like to prevent and disappear, segregation.
Explanation:
First of all, nowadays the role of black Nationalism is only commemorative and even though it provided society a great benefit, it is outdated to modern society because inclusion, multiversity, and equality are promoted and sought effectively. It is irrelevant to our philosophical and social state because by only working towards the benefit of a certain minority it performs what it sought to eliminate. The segregation of minorities, today we live in a very integrated and cooperative society that has overcome movements to empower minorities. We don't have a perfect society but all of the social groups are equally valued and protected by law. Therefore, it is an outdated ideology.
The theory of delegate representation is best illustrated by "my job to present the people who elected me regardless of my point of view".
<h3>Who is a delegate?</h3>
This refers to a assigned person to represent a society, region etc as a representative in a political convention.
Hence, a delegate representation is expected to say that my job to present the people who elected me regardless of my point of view.
Therefore, the Option B is correct.
Read more about delegate
<em>brainly.com/question/4889839</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
it is called an individualist
The important principle that was established as a result of the Nuremberg trials was that individuals could be punished including national leaders for war crimes against humanity. The Nuremberg trials were a number of trials that were held by the Allied forces after World War II against the prominent military and national leaders of Nazi Germany.
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
