The first two-party system consisted of the Federalist Party, which supported the ratification of the Constitution, and the Democratic-Republican Party or the Anti-Administration party (Anti-Federalists), which opposed the powerful central government that the Constitution established when it took effect in 1789.
The correct answer is B) presidential impeachment.
How might similar statements influence congressional action?
presidential impeachment.
Congress has the constitutional power of impeaching federal officials, including the United States President.
When federal officials commit a crime or act in an incorrect way the House of Representatives can initiate an impeachment process.
The impeachment process is the official mechanism to remove the President of the United States, the vice president or other government officials that are suspected of having committed any high crime, treason, or misconduct. If the House of Representatives approves by sole majority articles of impeachment, the matter is presented to the Senate. The Constitution provides the Senate with the sole power to try an impeachment process.
Answer:
Respuesta: Debemos eligir de forma responsable nuestro gobierno escolar porque serán las autoridades que verán por los intereses de la institución educativa y sus estudiantes, por lo que deben ser fieles a los valores y principios que profese dicha institución.
Explanation:
Answer: D
Explanation: The correct answer is letter D, integrity vs despair.
This stages goes from 65 years approximately; in this stage there is a level of integrity related to have reached certain experience during its life but it also can prevail the feeling of despair where the person feels that their days are almost over and usually feel lonely. It is important in this stage that the person can live without restrains and let him/her feel supported.
Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
