Answer:
Not necessarily. If picture is drawn to scale, no.
Step-by-step explanation:
Line segment EF is certainly perpendicular to line segment AC, but we don't know if it bisects or not.
If the picture isn't drawn to scale, there is no way to know if EF is a perpendicular bisector to AC or not because we do not know if AD = CD.
If the picture is drawn to scale, EF is not a perpendicular bisector to AC because we can see that AD ≠ CD and therefore EF cannot be a perpendicular bisector.
Answer:
Hyperbola
Step-by-step explanation:
<u />
Answer:
never
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the area of the circle will always be a transcendental number and the area of a square has to be an integer, this can never happen in a finite number of steps. Therefore, you cannot square a circle
Answer:What’s the question-
Step-by-step explanation:9-4 and greater than -19? Oh 5 because 9-4=5 but it’s greater than -19 because -19 is a negative number.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Start with why C isn't the answer.
y = 1.8^0 . The power is zero. Anything to the zero power (anything except 0 to the 0 power) is 1. So 1.8^0 is 1 not something else. C assumes that somehow 0,1.8 turns into 1.8. It does not. The second part is also wrong but you don't need it. However here it is.
x = 0 y = 3
x = 1 y = 3 * 1.8 = 5.4
x = 2 y = 3 * 1.8^2 = 3*3.24 = 9.72
You should be able to see that if you multiply 5.4 by 3, you don't get 9.72
C just does not work.
=======
The actual answer is A. That's exactly what the graph does. If you multiply 5.4 * 1.8 you should get 9.72. Just for completeness, I've included the graph.