1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maria [59]
3 years ago
5

A gardener wishes to design a rectangular rose garden with one side of the garden along a main road. The fencing for the 3 non-r

oad sides is $6 a foot and the fencing for the 1 road side is $8 a foot. A further condition is that the total cost for the fencing must come to $2 for every square foot of the area of the rose garden. What is the minimum cost for the fencing that can satisfy these conditions?
ANY HELP WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED
Mathematics
2 answers:
Reptile [31]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

There is no minimum cost for the fencing that can satisfy these conditions.

as the equation obtained for this problem is y = \frac{7x}{x-6}.

Step-by-step explanation:

let length of the rectangular rose garden be x

and breath of the rectangular rose garden be y

then the area of the garden = xy

cost of fencing a foot for the 3 non road sides = $6

and cost of fencing a foot for a road side = $8

total cost of fencing = 6x + 8x + 6y + 6y

so, total cost = 14x + 12y

cost of fencing for every square foot of the area =$2

So, 2xy = 14x + 12y

=> 2xy = 14x + 12y

Also, x and y has to satisfy x>0 and y>0

You can solve for y (or x if you prefer)

2xy-12y=14x

xy - 6y = 7x

y(x-6)=7x

y = \frac{7x}{x-6}

we can check that this function has no minimum value.

as we increase x (starting any x > 6 to make y positive) to make y minimal, y will decrease but the product xy will increase.

So, there is not a minimum cost for fencing that can satisfy these conditions.

Brilliant_brown [7]3 years ago
5 0
This problem does not have solution.

When you do the algebra you find that the statementes lead to the equation of a hyperbola which does not have a minimum. And so there is not a minimum cost.

This is how you may get to that conclusion using math:

1) variables:

x: length of the side of the fence parallel to the road
y: length of side of the fence perpendicular to the road

2) area of the garden enclosed by the fence: xy

3) cost of the fence: multiply each length times its unit cost per foot

cost = 6x + 8x + 6y + 6y

cost = 14x + 12y

4) cost is also equal to $ dolars times the area = 2xy

So, 2xy = 14x + 12y

=> 2xy = 14x + 12y

Also, do not forget that x and y has to satisfy x>0 and y>0


You can solve for y (or x if you prefer)

2xy-12y=14x
xy - 6y = 7x
y(x-6)=7x
y = 7x / (x -6)

You can verify that as you increase x (starting any x > 6 to make y positive) to make y minimal, y will decrease but the produc xy will increase.

for example do x = 100, you get xy ≈ 744, x = 1000 xy≈7042, and that trend never ends.

If you know about limits you can show that.

At the end, there is not a minimum cost




You might be interested in
1+1=??? HELP ME PLEASSEEE IM GOING CRAZY
Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer: 2

Step-by-step explanation:

U take the 1 and throw another 1 and it makes 2

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ASAP!! Please help me. I will not accept nonsense answers, but will mark as BRAINLIEST if you answer is correctly with solutions
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

f(x) = 2(x –3)²

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 2x² – 12x + 18

The vertex form of the above expression can be obtained as follow:

f(x) = 2x² – 12x + 18

Factorise

f(x) = 2(x² – 6x + 9)

Next, we shall simplify x² – 6x + 9 by factorisation method.

This is illustrated below:

x² – 6x + 9

Multiply the first term i.e x² and last term i.e 9 together. The result is 9x².

Next, find two factors of 9x² such that their sum will result to the 2nd term i.e –6x in the expression above.

The factors are –3x and –3x

Next, replace –6x with –3x and –3x in the equation above as shown below:

x² – 6x + 9

x² – 3x –3x + 9

Factorise

x(x – 3) –3(x –3)

(x –3)(x –3)

(x –3)²

f(x) = 2x² – 12x + 18

f(x) = 2(x² – 6x + 9)

f(x) = 2(x –3)²

Therefore, the vertex form of the function f(x) = 2x² – 12x + 18 is

f(x) = 2(x –3)²

4 0
3 years ago
VW = WX = YW = ZX = VX = view image attached thank youuu!
jeka57 [31]

Answer:

assuming this is a rectangle:

VW=31

WX=19

YW=36.36

ZX=18.18

VX=36.36

Step-by-step explanation:

VW=VX

VW=31

WX=VX

WX=19

YW^2=19^2+31^2

YW^2=361+961

YW^2=1322

YW=36.36

ZX=1/2VX

ZX=18.18

VX=YW

VX=36.36

3 0
3 years ago
Suppose that Adam rolls a fair six-sided die and a fair four-sided die simultaneously. Let AAA be the event that the six-sided d
myrzilka [38]

The question is incomplete. Here is the complete question.

Suppose that Adam rolls a fair six-sided die and a fair four-sided die simultaneously. Let A be the event that the six-sided die is an even number and B be the event that the four-sided die is an odd number. Using the sample space of possible outcomes below, answer each of the following questions.

What is P(A), the probabillity that the six-sided die is an even number?

What is P(B), the probability of the four-sided die is an odd number?

What is P(A and B), the probability that the six-sided die is an even number  <em>and</em> the four-sided die is an odd number?

Are events A and B independent?

a) Yes, events A and B are independent events.

b) No, events A and B are not independent events.

Answer: P(A) = 1/2

P(B) = 1/2

P(A and B) = 1/4

a) Yes, events A and B are independent events.

Step-by-step explanation: The event A is related to a six-sided die, so total possibilities is 6.

For a six-sided die to show a even number, there are 3 possibilities: (2,4,6)

so, P(A) = 3/6 = 1/2

The event B is for a 4-sided die, i.e. total possibilities is 4.

To show an odd number, there are 2 possibilities: (1,3).

Then, P(B) = 2/4 = 1/2

Now, the probability of occuring A and B is:

P(A and B) = P(A).P(B)

P(A and B) = 1/2*1/2

P(A and B) = 1/4

The events are <u>independent</u> events because the probability of A happening does not influence the occuring of event B.

3 0
4 years ago
A person who is 2 m tall casts a shadow that is 5 m long. At the same time, a building casts a shadow that is
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

9.6

Step-by-step explanation:

First you figure out that the shadow is 2.5 times larger than what is casting it. Then you divide 24 by 2.5.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • yolanda drove 50 miles in 2 hours at a constant speed. use a proportion to find how long it would take her to drive 150 miles at
    8·2 answers
  • A company is expanding its building area from 20,000 square feet to 25,600 square feet. What is the percentage increase of the a
    8·2 answers
  • Select the most precise and correct definition of parallel lines from among those that are given. Choose 1 answer: Choose 1 answ
    6·1 answer
  • 50 POINTS!!!!!! PLS HELP ME ASAP
    13·1 answer
  • Mr Rai sale a watch for Rs 2035 a profit of 10% how much money has he paid to buy the also find his profit amount​
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with this
    15·1 answer
  • In the diagram SOP ~ GNQ. find the value of x.
    9·1 answer
  • Por favor resuelva este problema con sustitución.
    15·1 answer
  • Rational numbers can be written as either terminating or nonterminating decimals. What kind of nonterminating decimals are ratio
    12·1 answer
  • How many numbers between 25 and 400 are divisible by 11? find their sum
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!