#1
Clear shown in graph
#2
No
At. no where graph passes through origin so y intercept is not 0 at anywhere
#3
Domain is x values
#4
Range is y values set
9514 1404 393
Answer:
no feasible solutions
Step-by-step explanation:
There are so many inequalities that determining the area covered by all 5 of them is problematic. Hence, we have reversed all of them in the attached graph, so any feasible solution region would remain white. Alas, there is no such region.
This system of inequalities has <em>no feasible solution</em>.
Answer:
Answer 1; Angles forming a linear sum to 180°
Answer 2; Substitution
Answer 3; Definition of perpendicular lines
Step-by-step explanation:
The two column proof is presented as follows;
Statement 
Reason
1. ∠SWT ≅ ∠TWU Given
2. m∠SWT + m∠TWU = 180° Angles forming a linear sum to 180°
3. m∠SWT + m∠SWT = 180° Substitution
4. m∠SWT = 90° Algebra
5. 
⊥ 
Definition of perpendicular lines
Perpendicular lines are defined as lines that are at right angles (90°) to each other, therefore given that the angle formed by the lines and m∠SWT = 90°, therefore, the lines and are perpendicular to each other.
we conclude that if the scale factor from S to M is 3/2, then the scale factor from M to S is 2/4.
<h3>
</h3><h3>What is the scale factor from M to S?</h3>
Suppose we have a figure S. If we apply a stretch of scale factor K to our figure S, we can say that all the dimensions of figure S are multiplied by K.
So, if S represents the length of a bar, then after the stretch we will get a bar of length M, such that:
M = S*K
If that scale factor is 3/2, then we have the case of the problem:
M = (3/2)*S
We can isolate S in the above relation:
(2/3)*M = S
Now we have an equation (similar to the first one) that says that the scale factor from M to S is 2/3.
Then we conclude that if the scale factor from S to M is 3/2, then the scale factor from M to S is 2/4.
If you want to learn more about scale factors:
brainly.com/question/25722260
#SPJ1
