The big difference between the CIO and the Chief Digital Officer is the responsibility for turning IT into a value creator, which is something that the CIO typically doesn’t have in most organizations.
<h3>How to compare the difference?</h3>
The chief digital officer is the leading digital business from the front in a way that most CIOs aren’t. It should be that most CIOs are not trying to think of new markets, new channels, or new business models that the organization should be getting and making that a top priority. .
The CIO is used to operate much larger operations. The Chief Digital Officers are very multidisciplinary, so they have a lot of different experiences, and they're very comfortable talking with marketing and sales in their language.
They’re very good at talking to the product teams in their language and operations in their language, and executives, and so on. And not to the same degree that we see the CIOs that don’t really talk the language of business .
Learn more about digital media on:
brainly.com/question/25356502
#SPJ1
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. Amount of adjusting entry for uncollectible accounts
= Estimated balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts + debit balance
= $16,400 + $4,000
= $20,400
b. Adjusted balances
For account receivable
= account receivable
= $420,000
For allowance for doubtful debts
= Estimated amount
= $16,400
For bad debts
= AMount of adjusting entry
= $20,400
c. Net realizable value
= Account receivable balance - estimated balance of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
= $420,000 - $16,400
= $403,600
Answer:
Objectives of HRM include ensuring availability of resources, easy access to data, on-time payroll, ensuring compliances, etc. HRM objectives are basically influenced by organisational goals and vertical. Objective of HRM is to ensure a stable work environment with data at one place and efficient operations.
Answer:
The answer is: No, he can't discriminate.
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 defined citizenship without distinction of race or color, and stated that all citizens are equally protected by the law.
So the owner of the house (as well as everyone else in this country) is prohibited by law to discriminate potential buyers on the basis of race.