Answer: 5, e, politics are a social structure on we’re cert academic people stand, most are known as citizens (middle class) very wealthy beings would be known as the highest on the first class.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Differential association theory ".
Explanation:
Sutherland assesses throughout this theory whether an illegal activity is not to be dismissed out of hand by labeling the suspect 'easy'. Like most social education concepts, this theory assumes that such a person's actions are affected and conditioned by certain participants with whom they are associated.
- The predominant comparison group seems to be the nuclear family, with whom the adult lives as well as gets older or develops. Such experiences are believed to create an interpretation of social expectations and expectations for entities.
- The above discovery creates legitimacy for such a theory or concept of differential associations.
In some research, the researchers are not able to use random assignments to divide participants among groups. Instead, they compare preexisting groups, which results in a quasi-experimental design.
Random assignments are those which are given as a matter of chance to ensure fairness and equal opportunity for all participants. Here participants forming multiple groups are with similar characteristics. So all groups are the same at the start of the experiment.
A quasi-experimental design applies a non-random method, and subjects are assigned to preexisting groups. There are some situations where true experiments can't be used for practical reasons. In such cases, a quasi-experimental design is a suitable tool.
To learn more about quasi experimental design here
brainly.com/question/28145500
#SPJ4
Answer: Tip of the Tongue
Explanation: Tip of the tongue which is also known as TOT is the phenomenon of failing to retrieve a word or term from memory, combined with partial recall and the feeling that retrieval is imminent.
Answer: Negatively
Explanation:
Enlightenment ideas were not completely against monarchs but did have problems with the absolute nature of the rule of said monarchs.
Before Enlightenment, monarchs generally ruled as they pleased with the logic being that they had the right to rule from God and so had the right to control the nation as their personal property.
Enlightenment was against this and instead espoused the logic that a monarch was only able to rule due to a social contract signed between them and the people whereby they would be allowed to rule provided they took care of their subjects.
Monarchs reacted to this with negativity because it meant that they had to stop being so selfish with resources and had to share power with the people. As time went on however, and with constant pressure on them, they had to relent and it led to the dissolution of several monarchies in Europe and the transition of others to Constitutional Monarchies.
